There is a surprising relationship between solvable quintics and Pythagorean triples. Given
y5+Ay4+By3+Cy2+Dy+E=0
then there is an extremely broad solvable class with four free parameters (A,B,C,D) and E is only a quadratic with respect to the others. For simplicity, transform the quintic into depressed form,
x5+10cx3+10dx2+5ex+f=0
If c≠0 and the coefficients form the Pythagorean triple,
(c3−25c4−16cd2−ce+10c2e+d2−e2)2+(2c2d−2cf+2de)2=(c3+25c4+16cd2−ce−10c2e+d2+e2)2 then the quintic is solvable in radicals. Expanding, the above becomes
(−25c6−40c3d2−16d4+35c4e+28cd2e−11c2e2+e3−2c2df−2def+cf2)×c=W×c=0
where W is simply the constant term of Watson's sextic resolvent equated to zero. (We just multiplied it by c to get the Pythagorean form.)
Example. Let (c,d,e)=(1,2,−3), then W factors as (f−28)(f+36)=0. So another nice feature of these quintics is they come in pairs. Hence
x5+10x3+20x2−15x+28=0x5+10x3+20x2−15x−36=0
are irreducible but solvable in radicals. And using the formulas above, their (c,d,e,f) yield the triple,
1202+642=1362