especially for s=3, one of which was a rediscovery of Euler's continued fraction (useful for any general series) βζ(3)=1u1−16u2−26u3−36u4−⋱
where β=1 and the un, starting with n=1, are, un=(n−1)3+n3=(2n−1)(n2−n+1)=1,9,35,91,…
Apery found an accelerated version, un=n3+(n−1)3+4(2n−1)3=(2n−1)(17n2−17n+5)=5,117,535,1463,…
(notice the sum of cubes) where now β=16, and established that its rate of convergence was such that ζ(3) could not be a ratio of two integers, thus famously proving its irrationality. Ramanujan also gave,ζ(3)=1+1v1+131+13v2+231+23v3+⋱
where the vn, again starting with n=1, are given by the linear function,vn=4(2n−1)=4,12,20,28,…
Using an approach similar to Apery's of finding a faster converging version, I found via Mathematica that,ζ(3)=6w1+131+13w2+231+23w3+⋱
where the wn are now defined by the cubic function, wn=4(2n−1)3=4,108,500,1372,…
Unfortunately, no comparable continued fraction is yet known that proves the irrationality of ζ(5).
No comments:
Post a Comment